Soalan yg dah tahu jawabnya, tapi saja..

Malaysia or Malaysaja? Part 2: Clarifying and reconciling the Constitution


By NURUL IZZAH ANWAR

Since I wrote my 31 August 2010 article, titled “The Ultimate Malaysian Debate: Malaysia or Malaysaja?”, which called for a constructive engagement with Perkasa, and with the stated purpose to seek clarification and not challenge or repeal the constitution, my invitation to Perkasa has not only been rejected but countless accusations and police reports were made against me.

I believe as a democracy, that all opinions made related to the article — which I hope was not lost in translation — is accepted and responded to with thanks.

With that, I invite everyone to read the full article again. (see: http://www.mysinchew.com/node/44287 )

I stand by that article and will remain a Malaysian Patriot forever.

I also recommend that the Malaysian Constitution be read in conjunction with the Articles mentioned. For brevity, the fantastic MyConstitution brochures produced by the Malaysian Bar Council are also very helpful.

Part 2: Clarifying and Reconciling the Constitution

In the interest of framing the context of my concerns for the state of our nation, I have written this sequel.

I wish to continue in the path of constructive engagement with all concerned Malaysians.

I again reaffirm that I only seek clarifications and not to challenge or ask to repeal our constitution.

I have decided to make a list of issues concerning “Malay Rights”, that needs to be clarified and reconciled between the mixed government policy signals over the years in relation to Article 153, Article 152, Article 89 and the NEP.

The main contention for clarification is that, how do we reconcile between the need for change to meet current circumstances facing the nation today and the constitution — the raison d’etre of my proposed debate with Perkasa for a better Malaysia?

The list, where all the information is available as a matter of public record, is as follows:

Part XII, General and Miscellaneous — Article 153 — Reservation of quotas in respect of services, permits, etc., for Malays and natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak.

Article 153 contains a quota mechanism in the form of Article 153 (2)… the Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall exercise his functions under this Constitution and federal law… to ensure the reservation for Malays and natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak of such proportion as he may deem reasonable for:

•dan seterusnya...

Hidup Malaysia! (or Hidup Malaysaja!?)

(Note: Bersih’s Joint Communiqué for Election Reforms provides an illuminating argument on the subject. Please support and promote new Voter Registration.)

[Nurul Izzah Anwar is the MP for Lembah Pantai.]

Notes:
[1] The Star, 7 May 2010, High Court: It’s constitutional to teach Maths, Science in English and 8 May 2010, Court: It’s OK to teach Science and Maths in English, Both by M. Mageswari

[2] The Malaysian Insider, 21 July 2010, How poor are we, really? By Sheridan Mahavera.

[3] Straits Times, Singapore 9 November 2006, KL Reveals How Bumi Share Is Calculated — Move follows dispute over claim that Malays own only 18.9% of business equity By Malaysia Correspondent Carolyn Hong

__

Tak der mana2 ahli UMNO yg gagah perkasa lagi bijaksana mampu menjawab?



Kalau tak de, bior ler aku menjawab..belajarlah terima hakikat, MALAYSIA tu maknanya Tanah Melayu.



Malaysia atau MALAY SAJA...MALAY SAJA, apa dorang nak buat?



Hidup MALAYSIA atau HIDUP MALAY SAJA..HIDUP MALAY SAJA, so what, ada apa2 masalah ke?

__

Artikelnya panjang lebar, bla..bla..bla..semata2 nak main2kan perkataan MALAYSIA ATAU MALAY SAJA.

HIDUP MALAYSIA atau HIDUP MALAY SAJA..relevan ke?



Apakah selama ni MALAY SAJA pun..org2 cina mati kebulur ke? Tak nak kah, citer bilangan jutawan dan juta-jutawan org2 cina.



Yg sakit hati sangat ngan org2 Melayu ni apa halnya?

Terima le je hakikat...tiap projek yg Melayu dapat, 80 % dari keuntungan projek sapa dapat?

Jgn risau..org2 Melayu yg kuat shopping!! Gomen bagi ler banyak mana elaun atau bonus pada kakitangan awam yg majoritinya melayu--mereka akan leburkan semua tu pada kedai2.

kakitangan kerajaan ramai melayu mudah je..org2 cina tak brminat, lagi pun dah 50 tahun lebih duduk diMalaysia tapi tak tahu cakap melayu ngan fasih..



Cakap je ler..bukan MALAYSIA ATAU MALAY SAJA..TAPI u mau CINASIA ATAU CINA SAHAJA!!!

Cakap je terus terang!! biar org semua faham!!

___

Sebenarnya tak da apa2 isu pun..

Kerana brbilang kaum, dan brbilang2 keupayaan..nak tak nak, org2 Melayu perlukan org2 cina utk tembusi pasaran local atau pun oversea..gitu juga org2 Cina perlukan org2 Melayu..



Tak da apa2 pun nak dibincangkan atau nak "review" kembali perlembagaan..perlembagaan prsekutuan adalah aku-janji dan dipersetujui..terima je ler.



Betul ler...dah disebut dlm perlembagaan perkara trsebut tak leh dibincang dan disebut gitu2..

Tapi mereka bernasib baik kerna kerajaan kita adalah kerajaan yg hanya mampu beri AMARAN dan NASIHAT!!!
_
MALAYSIA ATAU MALAY SAJA..terang2 ianya provokatif..tulisan2 seterusnya semata2 nak citer ianya cuma artikel yg mengajak rakyat brfikir dari segi rasional!!

Naper tak nak tulis...MALAYSIA..atau MALAY-SIA sia dalam bahsa cina apa namanya?

Atau kenapa takkempen terang2 seluruh Malaysia..MALAY SAJA atau CINA SAJA!!